And if Obama pretends that we can resolve this by revenues alone, he is part of the problem, not the solution.
What part of the past 2 years makes Sullivan think that Obama favors revenue without spending cuts? Was it that Obama has enacted nearly 75% of the spending cuts called for by Bowles Simpson, and basically none of the revenues? Or the part where the federal workforce has declined more than any other time in history save for the post World War II draw down?
Are we talking about the same guy?
Save me, Jeebus!
520 Chestnut 
[…] it won’t raise enough. Well, OK, I agree it won’t raise a whole hell of a lot. But previously Sullivan complained that the President wanted too much (relative) […]