Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘NASA’

The President, to the Curiosity rover team at NASA:

“If in fact, you do make contact with Martians please let me know right away,” the president joked. “Because I’ve got a lot of other things on my plate but I suspect that that will go to the top of the list – even if they’re just microbes, it will be pretty exciting.”

Hell yea it would!

Call this a puff piece or whatever but I can honestly say that something I’ve always been impressed by is the fact that Obama seems to legitimately find science cool. I think that’s a good thing, and a welcome difference from those on the right who attempt to demonize science.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Priorities

Cost of War in Iraq: $3 Trillion

Cost of Bush Tax Cuts: $1 Trillion

Cost of Curiosity Mars Rover: $2.5 Billion

Imagine what NASA could have done with that kind of funding. Neil DeGrasse Tyson was right, NASA inspires us to dream. Kids will see how JPL landed the rover and think “I want to do that!” Hell, that’s what I thought. But instead of properly funding NASA, we blow everything on pointless, dumb-ass wars and giveaways to campaign contributors. 

Read Full Post »

When I went to bed last night, we didn’t have a working rover on Mars. As it turned out, when I woke up this morning, we did. So that’s pretty cool.

How much would you pay for the universe?

Read Full Post »

I’m On A Boat!

image

Check out these incredibly cool pictures… of the Space Shuttles going sailing!

Read Full Post »

Apparently, the really exciting thing of the day on the interwebs yesterday was asteroid mining:

Last week, space startup Planetary Resources announced its existence to the world. Co-founded by X-Prize founder Peter Diamandis and space entrepreneur Eric Anderson, the company is backed by a group including billionaire investors and even James Cameron. In a press conference today, the company announced that it is embarking on a long-term goal of exploiting the natural resources found on asteroids.

Oh good grief. No one is going to be mining asteroids in the forseeable future. So what do they want to mine?

In particular, the company intends to mine water (for space travel purposes as fuel and for life support) and precious metals. In particular, they are looking for platinum group metals – ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, and platinum. Planetary Resources co-founder Eric Anderson likens these metals to aluminum. Aluminum used to be a very expensive metal until it could be extracted cheaply. Anderson sees the platinum group metals in the same light.

The words “extracted cheaply” are key here, because when you’re talking about mining an asteroid, cheap doesn’t happen. But go on…

One thing that the press conference left frustratingly vague, however, is how the company plans on mining the asteroids for resources. The only technical aspects they discussed were getting through the prospecting stage.

Well, yeah. They were vague because they have no idea how to mine an asteroid in a technically or economically feasible way. No one does. So what’s really going on here?

The company plans on earning revenues relatively quickly –not from mining asteroids, but rather from derivative uses of the technology that they’re developing.

Aha! It seems to me hat these guys have no intent on ever mining anything. Rather, they plan on throwing around a bunch of probes and satellites then charging people for the data they generate. As it happens, there’s nothing wrong with that. Actually its probably really useful. And because they plan on hitching a ride on NASA vehicles, it could be a good funding source for some NASA project eventually. But as for asteroid mining? I have a feeling that’s just a way to generate buzz. It obviously worked. I hope that’s the case and these guys plan to be a legitimate technology provider for some low earth orbit research, because otherwise they’re today’s Snakeoil Salesman of the Day.

Read Full Post »

A tremendously good video arguing for funding of the space program. I couldn’t agree more. A depressing statistic: the 50 year budget for NASA is less than the bank bailout.

Watch it. Several times. NASA really is a force of nature, and a builder of the future. It is America, distilled. And we’re letting it shrivel up and die. (Via The Dish)

But I can’t possibly leave this out:

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills. Because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win.

The best of our energies and skills. We could use that again, no?

Read Full Post »